ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2026
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
NRC issues draft EA/FONSI for Duane Arnold restart
Efforts by NextEra Energy to restart the Duane Arnold nuclear power plant as early as 2029 continue to move forward with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's preliminary environmental assessment and determination that the restart would have no significant environmental impacts.
On Thursday, the NRC posted a draft environmental assessment and a finding of no significant impact for the Palo, Iowa, facility; the Federal Register notice was published on Monday. The Department of Energy’s Office of Energy Dominance Financing is a cooperating agency on the draft EA, as the DOE is considering providing financial assistance to the restart project.
T. Tanaka et al.
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 60 | Number 2 | August 2011 | Pages 681-686
Nuclear Analysis & Experiments | Proceedings of the Nineteenth Topical Meeting on the Technology of Fusion Energy (TOFE) (Part 2) | doi.org/10.13182/FST11-A12463
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
To examine the accuracy in the neutronics calculations for the Li/V-alloy blanket system without Be neutron multiplier, a fusion neutronics experiment on a Li/V-alloy assembly has been performed with a 14 MeV neutron source. Reaction rates and tritium production rates (TPRs) in the assembly were measured with activation foils and Li2CO3 pellets. The measured reaction rates sensitive to fast neutrons agreed almost within ~10 % with ones calculated by using the MCNP5 code, JENDL-3.3 library and JENDL dosimetry file 99. Though there appeared a possibility of a significant underestimation in the transport calculations for the energy range of <~4 keV due to nuclear data of vanadium, the measured TPR was consistent with the calculated one within ~8 %.