ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
North American construction is back—smaller and faster—at OPG’s Darlington
“The nuclear renaissance is real here,” said Ontario Power Generation’s Subo Sinnathamby on May 8, one year to the day after OPG secured a final investment decision to build the first of four planned BWRX-300 reactors at its Darlington nuclear power plant, and shortly after the new reactor’s foundation was lifted into place. “We got our license to construct in April and our [final investment decision] in May, and we’ve been off to the races since.”
Isao Murata, Shigeo Yoshida, Akito Takahashi
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 36 | Number 2 | September 1999 | Pages 181-193
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/FST99-A101
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Heavy concrete is a promising candidate material for a fusion reactor shield. It provides strong shielding performance, though it has a heterogeneous structure due to random arrangement of the heavy aggregates contained as absorbers. To obtain data for future fusion reactor shield designs, D-T neutron irradiation experiments using both heterogeneous and homogeneous heavy concrete samples were carried out to investigate how much the heterogeneity due to the aggregates affects shield performance. Leakage neutron spectra and reaction rates of activation foils were measured, and they were compared with the analyses by the Monte Carlo code MCNP-CFP. From the comparison of results, the measured heterogeneity effect was well reproduced by MCNP-CFP, though there was a slight disagreement in the thermal region. For a point neutron source, a heterogeneous shield was found to be advantageous compared with a homogeneous one from the standpoint of shielding performance above 1 MeV. This conclusion was exactly opposite to what was anticipated. Analysis of the results confirmed that the effect was strongly associated with the manufacturing process used for the heavy concrete. For thermal neutrons, a homogeneous shield is still regarded to be most preferable. To suppress the heterogeneity effect above 1 MeV, it is necessary to use a sufficiently large heavy concrete shield. Then analysis with a conventional calculation method is feasible except for the thermal neutron region. If a smaller shield is employed, a specialized Monte Carlo code with a heterogeneous treatment like MCNP-CFP should be used for the precise analysis.