ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2026
Nuclear Technology
September 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2026
Latest News
Second round of Launch Pad selections includes eight newcomers
The National Reactor Innovation Center at Idaho National Laboratory has announced 13 project selections across 12 companies for the Nuclear Energy Launch Pad, a Department of Energy–led program that integrates reactor and fuel facility authorization, testing, and deployment support for private nuclear developers.
The Launch Pad emerged from the Reactor Pilot Program and Fuel Line Pilot Program.
According to INL, projects selected include reactor development and nuclear fuel cycle advancements, including fabrication, enrichment, and conversion technologies.
Isao Murata, Shigeo Yoshida, Akito Takahashi
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 36 | Number 2 | September 1999 | Pages 181-193
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/FST99-A101
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Heavy concrete is a promising candidate material for a fusion reactor shield. It provides strong shielding performance, though it has a heterogeneous structure due to random arrangement of the heavy aggregates contained as absorbers. To obtain data for future fusion reactor shield designs, D-T neutron irradiation experiments using both heterogeneous and homogeneous heavy concrete samples were carried out to investigate how much the heterogeneity due to the aggregates affects shield performance. Leakage neutron spectra and reaction rates of activation foils were measured, and they were compared with the analyses by the Monte Carlo code MCNP-CFP. From the comparison of results, the measured heterogeneity effect was well reproduced by MCNP-CFP, though there was a slight disagreement in the thermal region. For a point neutron source, a heterogeneous shield was found to be advantageous compared with a homogeneous one from the standpoint of shielding performance above 1 MeV. This conclusion was exactly opposite to what was anticipated. Analysis of the results confirmed that the effect was strongly associated with the manufacturing process used for the heavy concrete. For thermal neutrons, a homogeneous shield is still regarded to be most preferable. To suppress the heterogeneity effect above 1 MeV, it is necessary to use a sufficiently large heavy concrete shield. Then analysis with a conventional calculation method is feasible except for the thermal neutron region. If a smaller shield is employed, a specialized Monte Carlo code with a heterogeneous treatment like MCNP-CFP should be used for the precise analysis.