ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2026
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
The top 10 states of nuclear
The past few years have seen a concerted effort from many U.S. states to encourage nuclear development. The momentum behind nuclear-friendly policies has grown considerably, with many states repealing moratoriums, courting nuclear developers and suppliers, and in some cases creating advisory groups and road maps to push deployment of new nuclear reactors.
H. Yamada, K. Ida, S. Murakami, K. Y. Watanabe, E. Ascasibar, R. Brakel, A. Dinklage, J. H. Harris, S. Okamura, F. Sano, U. Stroth, S. Inagaki, K. Tanaka, M. Goto, K. Nishimura, K. Narihara, S. Morita, S. Sakakibara, B. J. Peterson, R. Sakamoto, J. Miyazawa, T. Morisaki, M. Osakabe, K. Toi, N. Tamura, K. Ikeda, K. Yamazaki, K. Kawahata, O. Kaneko, N. Ohyabu, A. Komori, O. Motojima, LHD Experimental Group
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 46 | Number 1 | July 2004 | Pages 82-90
Technical Paper | Stellarators | doi.org/10.13182/FST04-A543
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
New stellarator experiments have been launched since the last compilation of the international stellarator database in 1995. Parameter regimes have been extended by Large Helical Device (LHD), and a variety of improved modes have been found since then. The revision of the international stellarator database has been initiated, driven by these emerging interests and by the requirements for a reactor assessment. Some provisional issues are discussed. An understanding of configurational effects is a prerequisite to the derivation of a unified scaling. Differences in magnetic geometry are influential in characterizing energy confinement. The results from the magnetic axis and elongation scans in LHD are highlighted. Comparison with tokamak confinement is also addressed. The revision of the database is in progress, and this paper is an interim report.