NRC discontinues consideration of 40-year license renewals

July 6, 2021, 9:34AMNuclear News
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission headquarters (photo: U.S. NRC)

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has halted efforts to consider allowing U.S. nuclear power plant owners to request 40-year license renewals for their facilities, the agency announced on Facebook and Twitter on July 2. Currently, the maximum potential operating lifespan for a plant is 80 years: 40 years with the original license, 20 more with an initial license renewal, and another 20 with a second renewal.

The social media statement linked to a June 22 NRC memo that stated, “The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff has completed an activity to assess the feasibility of extending the time period for license renewal of nuclear power plants from the current 20-year maximum to a maximum period of 40 years, and to identify options to implement this change. With more than 90 percent of the operating reactors possessing renewed licenses for operation to 60 years, this activity included consideration of the technical issues that would be associated with plant operation to 100 years.”

Consider this: The staff produced five specific recommendations:

■ Discontinue the activity to consider regulatory and other changes to enable license renewal for 40 years. (The memo noted that while implementation of a 40-year renewal could have benefits to both applicants and the NRC, this recommendation was based on the lack of interest from the industry and the strong adverse public response received at public meetings.)

■ Consider an evaluation of possible changes to oversight and inspection activities related to license renewal and subsequent license renewal.

■ Consider an evaluation to identify on-going research activities (related to concrete, cables, reactor vessel internals, and reactor pressure vessels) that could be extended to greater exposure levels to address the potential for reactor operations up to 100 years.

■ Periodically query the industry to determine its interest and timing to pursue operation to 100 years, so that the staff can identify the need, and time frame, to initiate the development of guidance documents that would support 100 years of plant operation.

■ Consider an evaluation of impacts on plant risk from the combined effects of multiple aged components.

Related Articles

Three Studies in Site Remediation

Having completed three separate decommissioning projects, EnergySolutions takes the final steps in restoring the sites to a natural state.

September 21, 2021, 12:00PMRadwaste SolutionsJeremy Kartchner

For any nuclear power plant that has been permanently shut down, site restoration is the ultimate decommissioning goal when contracting with a utility to demolish a facility. The task,...

NRC looking to fill open ACRS position

September 9, 2021, 7:00AMNuclear News

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is seeking qualified candidates for an open position on its Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards. The ACRS is an advisory group that provides independent...


Nuclear energy ensures clean energy jobs for working Americans, write the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the American Nuclear Society in Op-Ed.

September 8, 2021, 7:01AMPress Releases

The Biden administration’s climate goals will be met only by expanding carbon-free nuclear energy production, urge the American Nuclear Society (ANS) non-profit and the International...

The origins of The Reactor Safety Study

September 3, 2021, 3:56PMNuclear NewsThomas R. Wellock

In March 1972, Stephen Hanauer, a technical advisor with the Atomic Energy Commission, met with Norman Rasmussen, a nuclear engineering professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology....