Today's short video shows the emission of radiation in a cloud chamber. Enjoy!
SMR on trailer courtesy NuScale Power
On March 15, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) announced that it had accepted NuScale Power's application for Design Certification of its innovative Small Modular Reactor (SMR) design. This begins what will be, according to NuScale, an approximately 40-month process until the design is certified by the NRC.
There was a time when the mPower SMR (Small Modular Reactor) was the perceived industry leader. The consortium behind it won the first Department of Energy (DOE) funding award to move such a design through to licensing at the end of 2012, and it was planned that a two-reactor Generation mPower nuclear plant would be licensed and constructed at the TVA Clinch River site. Now, just over four years later, the effort - which has been through a fairly recent restructuring - has been ended by its participants.
Right now, in the United States, citizens have become active advocates on many subjects. Ever since the last election, congressional phone lines have been swamped. The March issue of the New Yorker magazine featured an article that discussed whether or not phone calls to Congress are still effective. In this new context, how will an advocate get her voice heard? (If you are reading the New Yorker article...spoiler alert...write a letter to your representative instead of calling.)
Shortly after Cecelia Payne-Gaposchkin presented her work on the sun in 1925, Maria Goeppert-Mayer was beginning to make her own waves in physics. After receiving her Ph.D. in physics in her home country of Germany, Maria and her new husband Joseph moved to Baltimore, where he had just been given a position as a professor. Maria also wanted to teach but was not allowed, only being given a job as an assistant working in a makeshift laboratory in a small attic.
By Will Davis
In the March 2017 issue of Nuclear News
Editors Note: This is a three-part series by Rita in honor
While I was watching the Third Way Advanced Nuclear Summit on February 21, a wide range of topics was also being discussed on Twitter related to the various sessions. One of the things that was brought up was the large number of private companies and universities now engaged in the development of advanced reactors. It occurred to me-and I said as much on Twitter-that some consolidation of the industry was unavoidable. In fact, it's probably necessary. There's historical precedent for it.
For me as a student, attending the ANS Student Conference is the highlight of my spring semester. Is it because I get to meet new professionals in the field and learn what they do? Or is it because I get to reconnect with other students from around the nation that I only get to see at conferences? Or maybe it's that I get to travel to another university and learn about their nuclear program and the city? Really, it is a combination of all these things that make me very excited to be attending the 2017 ANS Student Conference: "Dispelling Nuclear Myths" at the University of Pittsburgh, April 6-9.
by Linda Zec
Georgia Power has released the Fourth Quarter 2016 "Vogtle Timeline" video, detailing progress at the site where two new AP1000 nuclear units are being constructed. This video is just under ten minutes and is a solid addition to this well-received documentary series.
A wide range of engaging speakers from variety of nuclear companies, start-up initiatives, and government agencies participated in the fourth annual Advanced Reactors Technical Summit IV & Technology Trailblazers Showcase. It was comprised of nuclear industry who have improved upon engineering in many areas and have a strong knowledge of what technical and political problems need to be addressed. They came together to help bring ideas to overcome some of the challenges the industry is facing and are making progress on future concerns.
There has probably never been a time of more optimism and uncertainty for the nuclear industry than there is right now.
The 347th Edition of the Nuclear Blogger Carnival is featured this week at ANS Nuclear Cafe. This traveling attraction showcases the best of today's nuclear energy and technology writers. Brief abstracts of the posts are found below with links to the full posts at their original sites.
CONTE 2017 was an informative and successful gathering for those with a vested interest in nuclear training and education. The Hyatt Regency Riverfront in Jacksonville, FL was once again the beautiful setting for the event and as always it was well attended with participants from across the country and around the globe.
A number of media sources reported last week, and continue to report this week, that "radiation levels are soaring" at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in Japan and that radiation levels have reached levels that unnamed "experts" are finding "unimaginable." All of these claims are demonstrably false.
Reporting this week and last on the financial problems of Toshiba has variously contained the phrases "building reactors," "building nuclear plants," and many others. It seems that the general press is confused (and probably rightly so) when it comes to the terminology used to describe the nuclear power plant construction business. So, here I'll provide a guide to the process and terms used in the industry and describe the various players.
It is time for the ANS Friday Nuclear Matinee. Watch TEPCO, the operator of Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, use a camera probe inside the containment vessel of the No. 2 reactor.
Artist's concept of floating SMR nuclear power plant. Courtesy China General Nuclear
Announcements coming this week from China's big nuclear energy firms hint that the the Chinese government may have launched a focused initiative to broaden the manufacturing base for floating nuclear power plants. On January 23, it was reported that China General Nuclear (CGN) had signed an agreement with China State Shipbuilding Corporation (CSSC) to develop floating nuclear power plants. It was announced on January 25 that CGN had also signed agreements with the other of the two large Chinese shipbuilding firms, China Shipbuilding Industry Corporation (CSIC.) These agreements follow the year-old original agreement between CGN and CSIC that will lead to the construction of a single prototype floating power plant.