Nuclear-generated hydrogen could decarbonize marine shipping

August 10, 2021, 6:58AMNuclear News

On August 4, the Clean Air Task Force (CATF) released a white paper, Bridging the Gap: How Nuclear-Derived Zero-Carbon Fuels Can Help Decarbonize Marine Shipping, containing policy recommendations for a U.S.-led transition away from fossil-based shipping fuels to nuclear-produced fuels and energy carriers like hydrogen and ammonia. According to CATF, in 2018, the international shipping industry accounted for 2.6 percent of the world’s carbon dioxide emissions—more than the international aviation sector. Sector-wide emissions are on pace to triple by 2050.

“Nuclear energy is the largest source of carbon-free generation in the U.S., and this new report finds it could unlock the vast potential for zero-carbon fuels in order to decarbonize the global shipping sector,” said Brett Rampal, director of nuclear innovation at the Clean Air Task Force. “That won’t happen on its own, however. Federal support for both nuclear energy and zero-carbon fuels is crucial to seizing this opportunity—and it’s one that could pay dividends for the U.S. economy as the world commits to net-zero emissions shipping.”

Focus on fuels: Nuclear technology companies have been partnering with commercial shipping interests to explore the deployment of shipboard nuclear microreactors. In this report, however, the CATF focused on how land-based reactors—including reactors operating today—could be used to produce hydrogen. Hydrogen can be burned as a fuel and is often stored and transported as ammonia (NH3), which is often referred to as a hydrogen “carrier.”

Nuclear strengths: The report’s authors undertook an evaluation of the technical implications of using nuclear energy to decarbonize the marine shipping industry. Nuclear generation of clean fuels could offer several advantages, including the following:

  • Existing nuclear power plants already use hydrogen in daily operations.
  • Nuclear energy is an energy dense resource, so it takes up relatively little space while consuming few resources and can fit into the global shipping sector’s network of fueling hubs.
  • Nuclear energy is a firm power source that is always available and can provide high-temperature steam for efficient fuels production.
  • Much of the existing nuclear power fleet in the United States is accessible by coastal and navigable waterways.

The report notes, for example, that Texas’s South Texas Project nuclear plant (about 90 miles from the port of Houston) and Louisiana’s River Bend (located on the Mississippi River) could potentially produce hydrogen to fuel ships docked in Houston. Both plants are located near existing gas infrastructure.

U.S. leadership: The report also evaluated the United States’ potential to lead the transition to a decarbonized global shipping sector and offers several specific policy recommendations, including the following:

  • Increase funding and tax credits to promote zero-carbon fuel production and nuclear-derived zero-carbon fuel production.
  • Direct relevant agencies to explore and support the use of zero carbon fuels.
  • Extend zero-carbon or low-carbon fuel standards.
  • Promote technology inclusivity in policies supporting hydrogen-based zero-carbon fuels.

Nuclear can rapidly scale up: “The global marine shipping emissions are dangerously high and getting higher, and we absolutely must decarbonize the sector in order to combat climate change,” said CATF transportation director Jonathan Lewis. “That will require a sector-wide transition from conventional fuels to zero-carbon fuels like hydrogen and ammonia. To do so, we need to use all the tools at our disposal for making zero-carbon fuel, including one technology that has an unmatched track record of rapid scale-up when policy and private sector incentives are aligned: nuclear energy.”


Related Articles

Addressing the economics of clean energy

May 10, 2022, 12:01PMANS News

I often say that nuclear energy will play a key role in our clean energy future, and I believe that is true. However, it won’t happen automatically. There is no “divine right” behind...

Insights from the Three Mile Island accident—Part 2: Improvements

The accident at Three Mile Island revealed many areas for improvement in the safety of nuclear power that have been addressed continuously in the past 40 years.

May 6, 2022, 3:06PMNuclear NewsWilliam E. Burchill

Part one of this article, published in the May 2019 issue of Nuclear News[1] and last Friday on Nuclear Newswire, presented insights from the 1979 accident at Three Mile Island-­2 and...

Insights from the Three Mile Island accident—Part 1: The accident

Sparked by an article on the TMI accident that appeared in the March 2019 issue of Nuclear News, ANS past president William E. Burchill (2008–2009) offered his own views on the subject. Part 1 of the article appeared in the May 2019 issue of NN and Part 2 was published in June 2019.

April 29, 2022, 3:59PMNuclear NewsWilliam E. Burchill

The accident at Unit 2 of the Three Mile Island nuclear power plant on March 28, 1979, was an extremely complex event. It was produced by numerous preexisting plant conditions, many systemic...