ANS Board of Directors votes to retire outdated position statementsANS NewsNovember 23, 2020, 3:00PM|ANS News StaffThe American Nuclear Society’s Board of Directors on November 19 voted to retire several outdated position statements, as requested by the Public Policy Committee. Among them are Position Statements #37 and #63, dating from 2010, which have been retired for lacking policy recommendations and for being redundant, as other position statements exist with language that better articulates the Society’s stance on those topics.Position Statement #37, A Declaration on Sustainable Development, endorsed an all-of-the-above energy resource strategy to support sustainable economic development for a growing world population and to achieve an acceptable and equitable quality of life around the world.The ANS Board voted to retire position statement #37, as it lacks a policy recommendation and because language endorsing sustainable energy systems can now be found in Position Statement #43, Nuclear Technology's Critical Role in the World's Future Energy Supply, and in Position Statement #44, Nuclear Energy's Role in Climate Change.Position Statement #43 acknowledges that nuclear power plants can provide heat and electricity for many uses with minimal environmental impacts. Position Statement #44 articulates the Society’s endorsement of technology-neutral and performance-based policies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Along with recognizing the value of energy diversity in meeting energy needs, Position Statement #44 also recognizes that nuclear is the only energy technology with worldwide potential for growth that has a proven record of delivering large amounts of reliable electricity without greenhouse gas emissions across its lifecycle.Position Statement #63, External Costs of Energy Technologies, endorsed appropriately taking external costs into account for national energy policymaking. External costs are not included in the cost of energy production and instead include environmental and public health impacts across the life-cycle production of a resource or product.ANS voted to retire Position Statement #63, as it lacks a policy recommendation and because many of the statement’s concepts are incorporated into Position Statement #26, U.S. Nuclear Power Plants: A Vital National Asset.Position Statement #26 acknowledges that many U.S. electricity markets fail to recognize and appropriately compensate nuclear energy for its valuable attributes, including avoiding greenhouse gas emissions and providing the power grid with year-round reliability and resilience. Among its recommendations, Position Statement #26 endorses federal and state policy changes to level the playing field between nuclear power and other clean energy generation technologies, as well as adjustments to electricity spot and capacity markets.Tags:ans leadershipans position statementsclimate changecostsenergy supplynational assetsnuclear power plantssustainable developmentShare:LinkedInTwitterFacebook
Climate change needs an Operation Warp SpeedThe government of the United States should throw its muscle behind ramping up a mammoth, rapid rollout of all forms of renewable energy through Operation Warp Speed, similar to what is being done with COVID-19, Clive Thompson writes in an Ideas column for Wired.The rollout should include energy sources that we already know how to build—like solar and wind — but also experimental emerging sources such as geothermal and small nuclear, and cutting-edge forms of energy storage or transmission.Go to Article
Increasing costs of climate change–related disasters reflects importance of nuclearHurricanes, wildfires, and other disasters across the United States caused $95 billion in damage last year, according to new data referenced by the New York Times. The cost is almost double the amount in 2019 and the third-highest loss since 2010.The new figures, reported January 7 by Munich Re—a company that provides insurance to other insurance companies—are the latest signal of the growing cost of climate change. The spike reflects the need for increased reliance on clean energy sources such as nuclear, solar, and wind.Go to Article
Illinois AFL-CIO releases updated nuclear impacts reportIn response to Exelon’s announcement of the premature closure of two Illinois nuclear power plants—Byron and Dresden—the Illinois AFL-CIO released an updated version of the Brattle Group’s Illinois Nuclear Impacts Report.The report highlights the economic losses and environmental impacts Illinois’ and its local communities will face with the retirement of these plants, according to a January 5 article posted to the 23WIFR website.Go to Article
Exelon CEO urges Illinois legislators to save nuclear plantsCraneChristopher Crane, president and chief executive officer of Exelon, wrote in a Chicago Sun-Times op-ed, “The failure of national energy markets to support clean energy will soon force the premature retirement of two of [Illinois’s] six zero-carbon nuclear plants, putting thousands of people out of work, raising energy costs, and taking us decades backward in the fight against climate change."Crane urged Illinois policymakers to act quickly, as they face critical decisions about the future of energy that will affect the state’s environment, the economy, and the health of every family for years to come.Go to Article
The new normal?Mary Lou Dunzik-GougarHappy New Year! I sincerely hope that each of you found time to refresh and rejuvenate over the holidays, or at least have fun. Many indicators suggest that 2021 will be a better year than 2020, including a growing understanding of COVID-19 and its impacts and the availability of a vaccine. So many have suffered from job loss or even loss of businesses in 2020. Even for those of us fortunate enough to be healthy, gainfully employed, and able to work from anywhere thanks to Zoom and its competitors, uncertainty is still a challenging aspect of the pandemic.Go to Article
ANS signs agreement with Spanish Nuclear SocietyThe American Nuclear Society and Sociedad Nuclear Española (SNE) on December 10 signed a memorandum of cooperation (MOC) that creates a partnership between the two societies to cooperate in promoting the development of nuclear science and technology for peaceful purposes.Go to Article
Statement from ANS President Mary Lou Dunzik-Gougar on Barakah Nuclear Energy PlantANS congratulates the Emirates Nuclear Energy Corp. on bringing the first Barakah reactor to full operational capacity.Go to Article
ANS leaders’ op-ed urges New York Gov. Cuomo to keep Indian Point-3 operatingDunzik-GougarPiercyThe scheduled premature shutdown of Indian Point-3 will all but guarantee a massive increase in fossil fuel use, according to an op-ed written by American Nuclear Society President Mary Lou Dunzik-Gougar and Executive Director/CEO Craig Piercy that was published in the New York Daily News on November 30.Indian Point-3 is slated to be shut down in April 2021, four years before its operating license expires.Go to Article
Opinion: U.K. power stations could make hydrogen, heat homes, and decarbonize industryNuclear reactors have evolved to achieve more than just electricity generation and should be part of the U.K.’s plan to reach net-zero emissions by 2050. Photo: Royal Society, authors providedThe United Kingdom needs to start rebuilding its capacity to generate nuclear power, according to an opinion article published Wednesday on The Conversation by two members of the U.K.-based Bangor University faculty.Bill Lee, a professor of materials in extreme environments, and Michael Rushton, a senior lecturer in nuclear energy, argue that the plan by the Committee on Climate Change, which advises the U.K. government on the effort to reach net-zero emissions by 2050, is “strangely silent on nuclear power.”Go to Article
To fight climate change, accept nuclear energy“The world needs a mix of renewable power sources, including one that can carry on producing power when the others can’t—the sun doesn’t always shine and the wind doesn’t always blow,” British journalist Jonathan Gornall writes in an opinion piece posted Wednesday on the Asia Times website. Gornall argues that the residents of Suffolk County in the United Kingdom would be better served by the expansion of the Sizewell nuclear power plant than by leaving a wooded area untouched.Go to Article