A better model? Low levels of radiation and health effects

August 5, 2025, 7:01AMNuclear NewsFrank Augustine

One of the more pivotal issues in facilitating the use of radiation sources—including nuclear power—in the United States (and most of the Western world) is concern about the health effects of low levels of radiation. The current regulatory assumption is that every additional increment of radiation linearly increases the risk of cancer.

To continue reading, log in or create a free account!

Related Articles

Don’t scrap ALARA—modernize it

July 7, 2026, 9:29AMNuclear NewsGeorge Joslin, Arden Rowell, Seyed Reihani, and Zahra Mohaghegh

For decades, U.S. radiation protection has rested on two pillars: the linear no-threshold (LNT) model and the principle of “as low as reasonably achievable” (ALARA). Together, these have...

NCRP—The nation’s council

July 24, 2025, 9:30AMNuclear NewsKathryn Higley

For nearly a century, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements has served as the United States’ leading authority on radiation protection. Established in 1929 as the...

ANS responds to “antiscientific” op-ed

February 18, 2025, 3:06PMANS News

The Hill recently published an opinion piece by Cindy Folkers and Amanda Nichols entitled “They won’t tell you these truths about nuclear energy.” Sadly, after the first sentence, their...

Frank Augustine—ANS member since 1983

July 12, 2024, 9:30AMNuclear News

We welcome ANS members who have careered in the community to submit their own Nuclear Legacy stories, so that the personal history of nuclear power can be captured. For information on...