ANS responds to “antiscientific” op-ed

February 18, 2025, 3:06PMANS News

The Hill recently published an opinion piece by Cindy Folkers and Amanda Nichols entitled “They won’t tell you these truths about nuclear energy.” Sadly, after the first sentence, their so-called truth veers into a diatribe of antiscientific fearmongering and misrepresentations.

On behalf our 10,000-plus members across the globe, many of whom work in and around radiation every day, I would like to set the record straight. I originally submitted this response as a letter to the editor of The Hill but was informed they would not be able to use it. It seems The Hill would rather traffic in misinformation than allow a fact-based rebuttal.

The contention that any level of ionizing radiation is inherently dangerous is preposterous. Radiation has always been a natural part of life. Humans bathe in radiation every second of every day—from cosmic sources, the rocks and soil under our feet, the medical X-rays and CT scans that sometimes save our lives, and even the food we eat. The average American receives 620 millirems (mrem) of exposure annually. Many people get more in places like Denver due to its higher altitude and geology. Some places in the world have naturally occurring radiation levels that are so high they exceed U.S. nuclear worker dose limits.

Yet, after 60 years of research, we still do not see any convincing epidemiological connections between levels of “near-background” radiation exposure and the increased incidence of cancer in populations. Make no mistake: high doses of radiation can be harmful and even fatal, but that’s not what’s at issue here.

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the Environmental Protection Agency set strict exposure limits, and the nuclear industry adheres to even stricter safety protocols under the “as low as reasonably achievable” (ALARA) principle. How low is “reasonably achievable?” The average person living within 50 miles of a nuclear plant receives an additional dose of 0.01 mrem a year, which is roughly equivalent to the dose you would receive from eating one banana. Not one banana every day, or every week, or every month. Just one banana.

Nuclear power remains extremely safe and absolutely essential to American competitiveness, energy security, and global leadership. Don’t let the few remaining haters fool you.

Craig H. Piercy

Executive Director/CEO, American Nuclear Society


Related Articles

DOE, NRC prepare for government shutdown

October 1, 2025, 12:03PMNuclear News

The Department of Energy and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission will furlough thousands of employees and operate at reduced capacity under a government shutdown that started after midnight on...

Valar Atomics breaks ground in Utah

September 25, 2025, 9:30AMNuclear News

El Segundo, Calif.–based reactor start-up Valar Atomics recently announced that it has broken ground on its test reactor, the Ward 250, at Utah San Rafael Energy Lab (USREL), becoming the...

NRC’s hybrid AI workshop coming up

September 18, 2025, 7:21AMNuclear News

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission will host a hybrid public workshop on September 24 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. (EDT) to discuss its activities for the safe and secure use of artificial...

U.S. nuclear supply chain: Ready for liftoff

September 11, 2025, 7:00AMNuclear NewsCraig Piercy

This month, September 8–11, the American Nuclear Society is teaming up with the Nuclear Energy Institute to host our first-ever Nuclear Energy Conference and Expo—NECX for short—in...