How should PRA adapt to a changing landscape?

October 27, 2021, 12:10PMNuclear NewsKatrina Groth

Probabilistic risk assessment has been around for over 40 years, helping us understand the amazing, complex engineering systems we design, build, and operate. It’s a powerful tool, but the time has come to consider how we can modernize it. There are important gaps in PRA, including in areas such as human reliability, dynamics, natural hazards, and cybersecurity. However, there are three things that are even more important to do:

To continue reading, log in or create a free account!

Related Articles

NRC seeks public comment on PRA project

August 24, 2023, 9:30AMNuclear News

In a notice published in the August 21 Federal Register, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is requesting public input on the latest set of results from a multiyear project to study risk at a...

What is at the forefront of PRA today?

July 20, 2023, 3:00PMNuclear NewsAskin Guler Yigitoglu

Askin Guler Yigitoglu ( is a reactor systems modeling and safety analysis staff member at ORNL, chair of ANS’s Nuclear Installations Safety Division, and technical...

Human risk factors

July 17, 2023, 3:11PMNuclear News

Human factors engineering and risk analysis are part of every instrumentation and control upgrade and new reactor plan—from design and licensing to implementation and operation—and...