NN Asks: What did you learn from ANS’s Nuclear 101?

This was especially important as by the second day, it became clear that several students (including me) hadn’t been exposed to most of the math formulas being used (beta decay, separative work units, Q-value, binding energy). Though the speed of the course did not diminish, additional help was made available.

I found the breadth of content to be the most impactful aspect of the course. In addition to the science of nuclear engineering, we discussed radiation detection, the nuclear fuel cycle, reactors and power generation, licensing, regulatory concepts, industry codes and standards, and even advanced reactor technologies. I especially found the insights provided by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission expert very informative. It really opened my eyes to the challenging task they have. Even nearly a year later, I often return to the course slides to refresh myself on many of the topics we discussed.

If you are considering this course, my main recommendation is to prepare, prepare, prepare. In hindsight, even though I had prepared some, I wish I would have dug even deeper into the chemistry and math formulas central to nuclear power. Although Nuclear 101 is presented as an introduction, the speed required to get through the content does not allow much time to catch up if you get behind.

Commercial nuclear power is probably one of the most challenging industries in the world, so even an introductory course is going to be difficult. But, if you are willing to prepare, stay focused, and ask questions, then you will succeed—and find it well worth the investment.

Mike Harkin (mike.harkin@framatome.com) transferred to nuclear power from the world of defense contracting. He currently works as Framatome’s DOE contract manager for their Accident Tolerant Fuel and LEU+ program.