American Nuclear Society
Home

Home / Store / Journals / Electronic Articles / Nuclear Technology / Volume 121 / Number 2 / Pages 212-220

A Comparison of Long-Term Safety Aspects - Concepts for Disposal of Spent Fuel and Wastes from Reprocessing

Richard Storck, Dieter Buhmann

Nuclear Technology / Volume 121 / Number 2 / Pages 212-220

February 1998

Format:

Price:$30.00
Member Price:$27.00
Member Savings:$3.00

Differences in technical concepts for direct disposal of spent fuel and for disposal of high-level waste (HLW) from reprocessing are discussed. The preferred emplacement sites for spent-fuel elements are drifts instead of boreholes, which are used for vitrified HLW. The nuclide inventories of uranium and plutonium are considerably higher with direct disposal. The impact of these conceptual differences on the long-term safety of a repository in a salt formation is investigated.

The deterministically calculated radiation exposures for direct disposal and for disposal of reprocessed waste are both within the limits of the German licensing criterion. Furthermore, the differences in the radiation exposures are low, so from this point of view, neither concept is preferable. This result is surprising because the higher inventories of uranium and plutonium in the concept of direct disposal have a negligible influence on radiation exposure. It is shown that the layout temperature of a repository is a parameter influencing long-term safety, where higher layout temperatures are favorable.

 
 
 
Questions or comments about the site? Contact the ANS Webmaster.
advertisement