ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Young Members Group
The Young Members Group works to encourage and enable all young professional members to be actively involved in the efforts and endeavors of the Society at all levels (Professional Divisions, ANS Governance, Local Sections, etc.) as they transition from the role of a student to the role of a professional. It sponsors non-technical workshops and meetings that provide professional development and networking opportunities for young professionals, collaborates with other Divisions and Groups in developing technical and non-technical content for topical and national meetings, encourages its members to participate in the activities of the Groups and Divisions that are closely related to their professional interests as well as in their local sections, introduces young members to the rules and governance structure of the Society, and nominates young professionals for awards and leadership opportunities available to members.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC updating GEIS rule for new nuclear technology
The Nuclear Regulatory Agency is issuing a proposed generic environmental impact statement (GEIS) for use in reviewing applications for new nuclear reactors.
In an April 17 memo, NRC secretary Carrie Safford wrote that the commission approved NRC staff’s recommendation to publish in the Federal Register a proposed rule amending 10 CFR Part 51, “Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions.”
T. E. Gebhart, D. Shiraki, J. Baldzuhn, L. R. Baylor, S. J. Meitner
Fusion Science and Technology | Volume 75 | Number 2 | February 2019 | Pages 89-97
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/15361055.2018.1541399
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Future long-pulse magnetic confinement fusion reactors will require density and isotopic mixture control using steady-state repeating pellet injectors. For high-energy density burning plasmas, pellet velocities of 1 km/s and above will be required for sufficient plasma penetration to achieve high fueling efficiency. Currently, steady-state repeating injection systems utilize cryogenic extruder systems to produce an extrusion of solid deuterium or deuterium-tritium. In repeating light gas gun injectors, the solid extrusion is cut and simultaneously loaded into a barrel. Once loaded, a fast operating gas valve delivers a high pressure burst of gas to accelerate the pellet down the barrel and into the machine. This process takes ~10 ms to achieve. Adequate gas pumping of the extruder exhaust and injection line propellant gas collection chambers is necessary for optimal operation of the pellet fueling system. Excess solid from the extruder sublimates in an exhaust chamber. The gas pressure in the extruder exhaust chamber must remain low to maintain low heating loads on the cooling mechanism (cryorefrigerators or liquid helium flow) and to reduce thermal conduction to the extrusion. Pumping the injection line chambers is necessary to limit propellant gas flow into the machine. A numerical simulation code was created to predict temporal pumping performance for these repeating pellet injection systems. This paper outlines the methods and assumptions used to create this model and compares results to the pellet injection system currently employed on DIII-D, the steady-state pellet injection system planned for the Wendelstein 7-X, and a brief analysis of the ITER conceptual pellet fueling system.